Hot Issues
spacer
SMSFs: Our 'hardest' jobs
spacer
ASIC issues alert over big gaps in SMSF trustee knowledge
spacer
Super savings gap for women stuck at 30%
spacer
Statistics for all Australians
spacer
Super set to play bigger retirement role
spacer
Why SMSFs want estate-planning advice
spacer
The power of financial role models
spacer
Assess your retirement financial resources
spacer
Cryptocurrency audits tipped to increase this EOFY
spacer
Time to check your risk exposure?
spacer
Some general interest stats on SMSFs
spacer
Check trust deed to protect super in estate planning
spacer
Survey reveals strong opposition to retirement system changes
spacer
Australia by numbers – Update
spacer
Federal Budget 2018 – Overview
spacer
Your Budget
spacer
4 components of our 2018 Federal Budget
spacer
Tools to help you manage your financial position are available on our site.
spacer
New rules capture SMSFs trading big with cryptocurrency
spacer
Common EOFY slip-ups flagged for SMSFs
spacer
Beware residency rules if moving overseas
spacer
99 pct of SMSFs missing global opportunities
spacer
How to plan for a better retirement
spacer
Australia by numbers - Update
spacer
Determine your retirement goals
spacer
ATO issues update on cryptocurrency compliance traps
spacer
How likely is a global trade war?
spacer
Gig economy spike prompts calls for super policy changes
Article archive
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 2 of, 2016 archive
spacer
Making investing a family affair
spacer
Super and divorce: a personal finance issue
spacer
Market Update - May 2016
spacer
ASIC flags SMSF investors in scam risk
spacer
Older, greyer and still working
spacer
Working and contributing to super past 65
spacer
The pitfalls of part-year pensions
spacer
Replenishing SMSF memberships
spacer
Budget will hit 15% of SMSFs
spacer
The insidious side of low interest rates
spacer
Market Update - April 2016
spacer
Budget 2016-17
spacer
Do investment principles stand test of time?
spacer
Estate Planning - early inheritance
spacer
US economy will bend, not break
spacer
A detailed look at the ATO’s new LRBA guidance
spacer
Defying life's blueprint
spacer
ATO continuing lodgement crackdown
spacer
Another twist on the gender savings gap
spacer
Market Update – March 2016
spacer
Going solo
spacer
Age Pension means-test prevents rational decision-making
spacer
Changing times for super collectables
spacer
Preservation Age Rule
spacer
Why investing for retirement isn't just about super
Do investment principles stand test of time?

 

Time travel is a skill that would dramatically transform the world of the investor.

           

Sadly, despite all the technological advances of the past two decades, the ability to go back or forward in time remains the realm of science fiction novels, not a killer app on an investor's smartphone.

While time travel may still be the domain of TV and film producers the passage of time is a real-world test for investment ideas even if - as we are constantly reminded - history is not a great predictor of future returns.

Twenty years ago the movie Shine with Australia's Geoffrey Rush starring as the pianist David Helfgott was lighting up the movie screens, while at the Montreal Olympic Games Australian athletes brought home 41 medals.

Australia was a country of 18.3 million people with a median age of 37 and the median weekly household income was $637 while the Reserve Bank cash rate was set at 7.5 per cent.

The fledgling superannuation system had accumulated assets of $312 billion some four years after the super guarantee contribution had been introduced.

In 1996 a new, more modest undertaking was getting started - it was the year Vanguard established its Australian business which was its first outside the US.

The market has changed markedly - of the top 10 companies by market capitalisation on the Australian sharemarket in 1996 half have either dropped out of the top 10 or are no longer on the ASX.

We decided to look at the past 20 years through the time capsule of three different investors in 1996 - a 40-year old man; a 20-year old woman and a newborn baby boy- and test how our investment principles have stood up during two decades of significant geo-political shocks, stunning market rises and dramatic declines that included a global financial crisis.

They are:
Goals: Create clear and appropriate investment goals 
Balance: Develop a suitable asset allocation using broadly diversified funds 
Cost: Use low-cost, transparent investment options 
Discipline: Keep perspective and long-term discipline

One of the first lessons we can take from looking back over the past 20 years is that investors have been rewarded for taking extra risk.

An investor who invested $10,000 back at the start of 1996 in cash would have seen the nominal value grow to $26,800. Someone who had invested in the Australian sharemarket index would have seen the portfolio value grow to $51,400. The US sharemarket index was just slightly behind at $48,100 while Australian bonds grew to $37,600.

For our three investors Rice Warner was asked to model the superannuation outcomes. Remember back in 1996 super was really just getting started so our 40-year old did not get the benefit of a full career under the super guarantee nor the higher rate we have today.

The growth in the super system has clearly been one of the major developments in the Australian financial landscape in the past 20 years with it now being the second largest financial asset in average Australian households and the system growing into a savings pool of more than $2 trillion.

So when you look back over the past 20 years it is interesting to see how the super system has performed - a topical political discussion as the government is currently consulting on defining the objectives of the super system.

For our 40-year old now turning 60 and with retirement firmly in sight Rice Warner project their super balance at retirement (assuming SG only contributions, average wages and a 7.5 per cent gross return) to be $217,000 in today's dollars. That is projected to last until they are 74 years old.

For the woman turning 20 in 1996 and effectively just starting out on their working life the projected retirement balance is $395,000 when they reach retirement age.

For the baby in our investor trio the projected super account balance is $456,000 - more than double what the 40-year - old is likely to get.

More importantly, based on the ASFA comfortable retirement standard, the baby of 1996 could reasonably expect her super to last 13 years longer than their older baby boomer counterpart.

Higher contribution rates and a long-time period to allow compounding to work is driving these outcomes but it is interesting to reflect that even after more than 20 years our super system is not yet at maturity and the challenge remains for those in the older age bracket to be able to contribute enough to fund their retirement lifestyle.

 

By Robin Bowerman
Smart Investing 
Principal & Head of Retail, Vanguard Investments Australia
10 April 2016