Hot Issues
spacer
SMSFs: Our 'hardest' jobs
spacer
ASIC issues alert over big gaps in SMSF trustee knowledge
spacer
Super savings gap for women stuck at 30%
spacer
Statistics for all Australians
spacer
Super set to play bigger retirement role
spacer
Why SMSFs want estate-planning advice
spacer
The power of financial role models
spacer
Assess your retirement financial resources
spacer
Cryptocurrency audits tipped to increase this EOFY
spacer
Time to check your risk exposure?
spacer
Some general interest stats on SMSFs
spacer
Check trust deed to protect super in estate planning
spacer
Survey reveals strong opposition to retirement system changes
spacer
Australia by numbers – Update
spacer
Federal Budget 2018 – Overview
spacer
Your Budget
spacer
4 components of our 2018 Federal Budget
spacer
Tools to help you manage your financial position are available on our site.
spacer
New rules capture SMSFs trading big with cryptocurrency
spacer
Common EOFY slip-ups flagged for SMSFs
spacer
Beware residency rules if moving overseas
spacer
99 pct of SMSFs missing global opportunities
spacer
How to plan for a better retirement
spacer
Australia by numbers - Update
spacer
Determine your retirement goals
spacer
ATO issues update on cryptocurrency compliance traps
spacer
How likely is a global trade war?
spacer
Gig economy spike prompts calls for super policy changes
Article archive
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 2 of, 2016 archive
spacer
Making investing a family affair
spacer
Super and divorce: a personal finance issue
spacer
Market Update - May 2016
spacer
ASIC flags SMSF investors in scam risk
spacer
Older, greyer and still working
spacer
Working and contributing to super past 65
spacer
The pitfalls of part-year pensions
spacer
Replenishing SMSF memberships
spacer
Budget will hit 15% of SMSFs
spacer
The insidious side of low interest rates
spacer
Market Update - April 2016
spacer
Budget 2016-17
spacer
Do investment principles stand test of time?
spacer
Estate Planning - early inheritance
spacer
US economy will bend, not break
spacer
A detailed look at the ATO’s new LRBA guidance
spacer
Defying life's blueprint
spacer
ATO continuing lodgement crackdown
spacer
Another twist on the gender savings gap
spacer
Market Update – March 2016
spacer
Going solo
spacer
Age Pension means-test prevents rational decision-making
spacer
Changing times for super collectables
spacer
Preservation Age Rule
spacer
Why investing for retirement isn't just about super
Why investing for retirement isn't just about super

 

Financial advisers understand the value of setting long-term objectives.

Which is why there should be general support for the notion of setting a long-term objective for the superannuation system and enshrining it in legislation.

           

The Financial System Inquiry chaired by David Murray recommended that the primary objective of the Australian system ought to be "to provide income in retirement to substitute or supplement the age pension".

The Federal Government has begun the process of consulting on what both the primary objective ought to be along with several subsidiary objectives that get down into more detail that would ultimately allow future policy changes to be evaluated against.

The government has also flagged a number of other issues for discussion - one of which is the critical element of adequacy which fundamentally underpins ideas of how to measure if the super system is meeting its core objective.

There are two quite different perspectives. There is the government's public policy perspective and the notion of how much of the age pension is effectively being replaced by private savings - both mandatory and voluntary - via superannuation. 

Then there is the individual perspective - what does an adequate retirement income look like to you.

A key issue is that there is no consensus on how to measure adequacy - for instance, the OECD uses a replacement rate measure. For example, it could be to aim for 70 per cent of your final salary before retirement. That by its nature is a blunt measure given the retirement income of someone on average weekly earnings versus someone earning a high salary will be vastly different in dollar and lifestyle terms yet have the same replacement rate.

An alternative is to aspire to giving everyone a target level of income which is perhaps in line with measures like the ASFA comfortable retirement index that is currently $43,184 a year for a single retiree who owns their own home.

They are two very different approaches and outcomes. 

There is a common point of tension in much of the debate around super issues - be it adequacy or tax concessions - because it becomes a tug of war between the collective versus the individual.

Enshrining the core objective of superannuation in legislation is long overdue and it carries with it the hope that it will help provide some distance for superannuation from the short-term pressure of the annual federal budget/revenue cycle, because there is no doubt that the constant tinkering with rules is undermining confidence in what is by nature a long-term contract of trust between government and fund member.

We will know the government's position on the core objectives of superannuation in a matter of weeks along with any changes to tax concessions.

Once the collective guard rails are in plain sight, the focus will inexorably shift to the individual impacts and objectives. 

Superannuation naturally plays a key role in most Australian's planning for retirement. But it is by no means the only form of saving for retirement - just ask any small business owner.

At the end of the day, superannuation is simply a tax wrapper. It makes good sense to have money inside super to take advantage of the concessional tax rates, but depending on what the government decides, there may well be tighter limits on how much you can contribute or other reasons to invest more outside the super system.

For individual investors, the government's impending policy announcements are likely to be a catalyst to review existing arrangements. Inevitably, when super rules change, there will be technical issues to work through, but for individual investors the value will come from developing an overall plan for retirement savings and not just a super strategy.

 

By Robin Bowerman
Smart Investing 
Principal & Head of Retail, Vanguard Investments Australia
21 March 2016