Hot Issues
spacer
Our Advent calendar for 2017
spacer
Australia's vital statistics
spacer
Made in Albania? How globalisation is creating challenges for Chinese policymakers
spacer
For the young it a question of engagement
spacer
Address Under-insurance at Personal Finance Level - Global study
spacer
Realism vs reality - working part-time as retirees
spacer
SMSFs warned on ‘ticking time bomb’ with outdated deeds
spacer
Statutory wills are underutilised in estate planning
spacer
Resources on our site to help you, your family and your friends.
spacer
Calls to Review ASIC's Definition of Lapse Insurance
spacer
Paperwork bungles lead to $38k in payments
spacer
Self-employed? Don't miss out on super
spacer
Australian Dietary Guidelines and healthy eating chart (PDF)
spacer
Big concessions looking likely for transfer balance limit: ATO
spacer
Raft of superannuation measures enter Parliament
spacer
US Fed policy: Normalisation begins
spacer
What the gig economy may mean for your super
spacer
Powerful Budgeting, cash flow and Super Tools available on our site.
spacer
Australia's leading causes of death - ABS
spacer
Government introduces first home scheme laws
spacer
Are young investors wasting their youth?
spacer
ATO granted super enforcement powers
spacer
The great Australian (retiree) dream
spacer
ATO to release further guidance on reserves
spacer
A real-world benchmark for SMSF performance
spacer
How is your super going, ready for retirement?
spacer
Our 'hardest' SMSF tasks
Article archive
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
SMSFs warned on ‘ticking time bomb’ with outdated deeds

A surprising number of older SMSF deeds pre-dating the 2008 financial year still remain, some of which contain inappropriate clauses exposing members to unforeseen risks, an industry lawyer warns.

   

 

DBA Lawyers senior associate William Fettes said while reviewing and updating a trust deed can be a costly exercise, it is generally recommended that SMSF trust deeds are updated every four or five years or when there is a major legislative change.

The last major legislative change to superannuation that warranted a wholesale update, he said, occurred in mid-2007.


“[So] I think these pre-FY 2008 deeds are very much in the category where it's a no brainer — it's strongly encouraged that you would get an update,” said Mr Fettes.

“The ones that are even older than that are going to be worse. They really can be ticking time bombs. For example, where you've got some sort of principal employer entity there that's associated with the fund.”

The client may not realise it, he said, but if they, for example, deregister that company, some deeds have provisions that say the fund just has to be wound up.

“There's no way around it, and you end up tainting the fund significantly without even really realising it,” he said.

“Occasionally you can resurrect the company in order to try and fix that, but that's a whole big exercise in itself to deal with ASIC around resurrecting a company, and so it can be a real ticking time bomb for clients that have those really old deeds and so we still see plenty of that around.”

While it may not be strictly necessary for a trust deed to be updated following the more recent changes to the system, SMSF trustees may still want to in order to take advantage of certain strategies, he said.

“There is an argument that you can be fully compliant with the law because a lot of the major [changes] that were implemented with the tax provisions, around the transfer balance cap, the different interactions with the caps and a lot of the other concessions, are imposed by tax law. But you're not going to have the type of flexibility and features that you necessarily want in order to take full advantage of the best strategies and so forth.”

 

By: Miranda Brownlee
22 NOVEMBER 2017
smsfadviser.com