Hot Issues
spacer
Assess your retirement financial resources
spacer
Cryptocurrency audits tipped to increase this EOFY
spacer
Time to check your risk exposure?
spacer
Some general interest stats on SMSFs
spacer
Check trust deed to protect super in estate planning
spacer
Survey reveals strong opposition to retirement system changes
spacer
Australia by numbers – Update
spacer
Federal Budget 2018 – Overview
spacer
Your Budget
spacer
4 components of our 2018 Federal Budget
spacer
Tools to help you manage your financial position are available on our site.
spacer
New rules capture SMSFs trading big with cryptocurrency
spacer
Common EOFY slip-ups flagged for SMSFs
spacer
Beware residency rules if moving overseas
spacer
99 pct of SMSFs missing global opportunities
spacer
How to plan for a better retirement
spacer
Australia by numbers - Update
spacer
Determine your retirement goals
spacer
ATO issues update on cryptocurrency compliance traps
spacer
How likely is a global trade war?
spacer
Gig economy spike prompts calls for super policy changes
spacer
Australia's vital statistics
spacer
What your age should say about your super
spacer
Downsizing requires holistic tax planning
spacer
Millions of multiple super accounts erode savings
spacer
Why your retirement intentions are critical
spacer
Plans for study into elder abuse
spacer
Our website is really our digital office.
spacer
Dissecting the downsizer contribution
Article archive
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Paperwork bungles lead to $38k in payments

An example of the need to keep good records for everything you do.

         

 

Back office and paperwork bungles have seen several workers given $38,000 in unpaid wages and entitlements, as the regulator sounds alarm bells on its monitoring of “the intricacies of our workplace laws.”
The workers were based in the Newcastle and Hunter region of NSW, and were victims of poor compliance practices and checks of their employers.

In one matter, a young labourer in Lake Macquarie was back-paid $25,220 after he was underpaid as a result of being incorrectly classified as an apprentice.

Essentially, it was agreed the labourer would commence an apprenticeship, but the employer failed to properly complete the paperwork and registration process required to enter into a formal training arrangement.

Consequently, the labourer was paid lower rates than he was entitled to, and the employer had not taken the appropriate steps to ensure compliance.

“Employers must be aware that we are prepared to take enforcement action in response to reckless, deliberate or repeated breaches of pay and record keeping laws,” said Fair Work Ombudsman Natalie James.

“We conduct follow-up audits of businesses previously found to be non-compliant to make sure they have changed their ways. Repeat offenders can expect to be subject to serious enforcement action including potential litigation.

“In our experience many businesses are overconfident when it comes to the intricacies of our workplace laws, however we will be taking an increasingly hard line with employers who have significant compliance issues and cannot demonstrate that they made a diligent effort to understand what award or industrial instrument applies to their workplace, what the correct classification for their employees is, and what minimum pay rates apply.”


By: Staff Reporter
04 OCTOBER 2017
accountantsdaily.com.au