Hot Issues
spacer
How is your super going, ready for retirement?
spacer
Our 'hardest' SMSF tasks
spacer
Lack of literacy promotes unrealistic goals
spacer
Young investors: Time is on your side
spacer
Is your SMSF retirement-ready?
spacer
Key Economic Indicators, 2017 - updated
spacer
Investors acting their age
spacer
ATO locks in details, addresses panic on real-time reporting
spacer
Government ‘undermines’ tax system in new moves on property expenses
spacer
Multiple super accounts in a 'gig' society
spacer
Why Australian retirees aren't happy and what we can do about it
spacer
Doing a budget is a good idea but ....
spacer
Technical expert flags estate planning strategies for 2017-18
spacer
Government to shut down salary sacrifice loophole
spacer
Items that heat up your depreciation deductions
spacer
‘Tens of thousands’ of SMSFs at risk with ECPI
spacer
Do’s and don’ts of estate planning
spacer
LISTO to help boost women’s super
spacer
Smart ways to stretch retirement money
spacer
Low economic growth likely for years
spacer
Recorded Crime - Offenders, 2015-16
spacer
Adequacy of savings still a concern among Australians
spacer
‘Bank-like heists’ make way for new wave of cyber crime
spacer
Give your children a saving and investing edge - for life
Article archive
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Technical expert flags estate planning strategies for 2017-18

With the $1.6 million transfer balance cap now in place, technical experts have identified some of the considerations that will need to be made in relation to death benefits and reversionary pensions.

 

 

Perpetual Private head of strategic advice Colin Lewis says many SMSF practitioners, in the lead-up to 30 June 2017, didn’t have the opportunity to review their clients’ estate planning in light of the changes to superannuation.

“SMSF practitioners now really need to start looking at the client’s estate plans in terms of what income streams they’re receiving, if they’re receiving any reversionary income streams or whether they just have binding death benefits in place,” Mr Lewis said.


“For those with more than $1.6 million, reversionary pensions may be treated more favourably in terms of the amount and when it’s counted towards the transfer balance account test.”

SuperConcepts executive manager of SMSF technical and private wealth, Graeme Colley, said it’s important reversionary pensions are considered carefully before they are implemented, as there can be some traps.

“If you’re going to put a reversion in, make sure your pension can move from being non-reversionary to reversionary,” Mr Colley said.

“If that’s not possible, they may need to commute that pension and start a new pension. The trap there will be that if someone qualifies for Centrelink benefits, then that is an issue they need to be aware of. That may lend itself to people keeping the non-reversionary pension. 

Individuals with more than $1.6 million who’ve had to do something with the excess or will be doing something with it to transfer it out of pension phase, will need to work out what to do with the money when it gets paid out to their family on their death, Mr Colley said.

“Or if their spouse dies, they’ll need to decide what happens with the money then,” he said.

“They might want to look at whether they can implement equalisation strategies for the estate [also].” 

 

MIRANDA BROWNLEE
5 Jul 2017
www.smsfadviser.com