Hot Issues
spacer
Our Advent calendar for 2017
spacer
Capital Gains and Renounceable Rights
spacer
Treasury finds Australia 'increasingly uncompetitive' as US moves on tax plans
spacer
Australia's vital statistics
spacer
SMSFs warned on ‘ticking time bomb’ with outdated deeds
spacer
Taxation ruling on commercial website deductibility
spacer
68% of SMEs ‘significantly stressed,’ 85% rely on accountants
spacer
Statutory wills are underutilised in estate planning
spacer
Small business slips on lodgement deadlines
spacer
300,000 SMEs utilising $20K write-off, says ATO
spacer
‘A bad thing times 10’: ATO set for new SMSF blitz
spacer
Capital Gains and Renounceable Rights
spacer
Paperwork bungles lead to $38k in payments
spacer
Australian Dietary Guidelines and healthy eating chart (PDF)
spacer
Former director liable for company’s unpaid tax liabilities
spacer
Resources on our site to help you, your family and your friends.
spacer
Super for housing measures enter Senate
spacer
No Special Circumstances to allow Excess Super Contributions
spacer
Housing tax measures progress to Parliament
spacer
AirBnb – wrong tax outcome?
spacer
Are young investors wasting their youth?
spacer
ATO sending 'more letters than ever' on income tax errors
spacer
Powerful Budgeting, cash flow and Super Tools available on our site.
spacer
Property, unit trusts in ATO's sights
spacer
Australian Dietary Guidelines and healthy eating chart (PDF)
spacer
Major Bank Levy Passed
spacer
NSW tops list as ATO reveals billions in lost super
spacer
Australia's leading causes of death - ABS
spacer
How is your super going, ready for retirement?
spacer
ATO increasing data exchange with international regulators
spacer
Illegal SMSF early access scheme leads to $6,000 fine
spacer
Our 'hardest' SMSF tasks
spacer
Uber drivers hit for 10% tax
spacer
Lack of literacy promotes unrealistic goals
Article archive
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
SMSFs warned on ‘ticking time bomb’ with outdated deeds

A surprising number of older SMSF deeds pre-dating the 2008 financial year still remain, some of which contain inappropriate clauses exposing members to unforeseen risks, an industry lawyer warns.

   

 

DBA Lawyers senior associate William Fettes said while reviewing and updating a trust deed can be a costly exercise, it is generally recommended that SMSF trust deeds are updated every four or five years or when there is a major legislative change.

The last major legislative change to superannuation that warranted a wholesale update, he said, occurred in mid-2007.


“[So] I think these pre-FY 2008 deeds are very much in the category where it's a no brainer — it's strongly encouraged that you would get an update,” said Mr Fettes.

“The ones that are even older than that are going to be worse. They really can be ticking time bombs. For example, where you've got some sort of principal employer entity there that's associated with the fund.”

The client may not realise it, he said, but if they, for example, deregister that company, some deeds have provisions that say the fund just has to be wound up.

“There's no way around it, and you end up tainting the fund significantly without even really realising it,” he said.

“Occasionally you can resurrect the company in order to try and fix that, but that's a whole big exercise in itself to deal with ASIC around resurrecting a company, and so it can be a real ticking time bomb for clients that have those really old deeds and so we still see plenty of that around.”

While it may not be strictly necessary for a trust deed to be updated following the more recent changes to the system, SMSF trustees may still want to in order to take advantage of certain strategies, he said.

“There is an argument that you can be fully compliant with the law because a lot of the major [changes] that were implemented with the tax provisions, around the transfer balance cap, the different interactions with the caps and a lot of the other concessions, are imposed by tax law. But you're not going to have the type of flexibility and features that you necessarily want in order to take full advantage of the best strategies and so forth.”

 

By: Miranda Brownlee
22 NOVEMBER 2017
smsfadviser.com